The principles of Law are simple!!
You just need to work out how to decipher the code?
Case law is the Re-coding of the decipher
prl2050
Campaign for
~
The full legal system
To be equally accessible to everyone.
~
And for the removal of the
legal industry
as a mandatory part of the legal system.
core issues
~
Members of the legal Industry do not recognise the wording and General interpretation of the primary law as the law!!
~
Only accepting their interpretation via the rewording in caselaw
Yes, that’s right,
We interpret the meaning of the primary law.
Then,
Pass that interpretation on to the police
and
It is that interpretation
The police
Will then charge you with.
(Sitting judge, Snaresbrook, Crown Court)
The whole industry is a self-regulated internal system
Contracted by the UK government’s legal department
To implement law and justice over the citizens of the United Kingdom.
~
However, the internal system has manifested as a self-regulated interpretation of the legal system.
~
At any point during a legal proceeding, without explanation, a member of the legal industry can turn around to you and say.
‘General Legal Industry member‘
“Good for business “
(Sitting judge – First-tier employment tribunal)
Proposal
The legal Industry will be an optional service only.
Being a qualified or experienced member of the legal Industry will not be a qualifying factor for serving as a judge at any level of the justice system.
The only required qualifications for a judge are a public record of lawfulness, moral decency, and fairness and a subconscious awareness of equality.
Compensation will only be awarded when a Financial loss has been incurred or is likely to be accrued.
Only
Free and publicly
accessible
Primary law will be applied.
With a common understanding of the meaning and definition of the wording.
Only Law, evidence, and circumstances recorded in the documentation presented to the court/tribunal and all parties before the hearing will be submitted and allowed.
(Subjected to pre-checks and agreement)
Any and all Law, evidence, and circumstances will be recorded in the ruling and on the public Record.
~
Any leniency is to be recorded and equally applied with no exceptions.
The expressions and language
used in a court of law
should be interpreted
equally
by all
Who can hear them
and are ruled by them!!
Under the rule of acceptance each time case law is applied for the understanding of the primary law. The opposing individual will have the opportunity to justify their acceptance or denial of the application of the Case law for the relevance of circumstances to justify their reasons for their lack of acceptance.
Anyone found to be preventing the course of justice will be charged accordingly.
(including but not limited to any information which may affect the course of justice before the documentation has been presented to the court/tribunal.
This new charge will not affect the outcome of the original claim and will be treated as a separate legal claim.
The new information can be used to affect the course of justice, and this change in the course of justice will be the foundational evidence for the conviction of knowingly, willingly, and/or absent-mindedly preventing the course of justice.
With no exceptions, anyone involved in the entire proceedings will be liable for charges of preventing the course of justice if their actions are proven to have prevented the course of justice, including administrative mistakes and any error in the application of the law.)
Case for the removal of the legal industry.
—————————————–
Under the current system appointed judges are appointed independent of the publicly elected government.
The primary law set by the publicly elected government can be reinterpreted and applied at the judge’s discretion on a case-by-case basis.
This includes instances
Where a member of the legal industry determines that the publicly elected government and/or the parliamentary procedure have misinterpreted the wording of the primary law and misapplied it.
—————————————–
Should the public or the publicly elected government feel there has been an error of law, the course of action is to campaign for a new primary law to be granted Royal assent
By HRH
And then hope the
Legal INDUSTRY
Agrees with the new wording.
The term
“ Generally accepted to mean “
Is widely used in the legal industry to argue/show an individual member of the legal industry’s support for the interpretation of a previous ruling.
(A ruling is the interpretation of primary law)
A ruling is based on the written recording of the law,
Evidence and circumstances.
Presented to the court of prior rulings and how these prior rulings were interpreted and applied.
The judge/’s can change the meaning and interpretation of any word or
“ generally accepted to mean “ interpretation of prior rulings within a single ruling.
You will only have full access and an explanation?
If your paid legal representative knows of the new ruling and accepts the
“ Generally accepted to mean “
Judge/s recording of the Law, evidence, and circumstances.
As the Legal Industry is based upon the General acceptance of the majority of legally qualified members, accepting the same
“ Generally accepted to mean “
But this can change from judge to judge depending upon which particular dickhead vs dickhead with the same meaning as dickhead vs dickhead the judge/’s/legal members.
Generally Accept to Mean
?
Judges are given the power to grant leniency
When requested
and
at their own discretion.
FAIR IS FAIR!!
Some people make human mistakes!!
prl2050
Some people, including many members of the legal Industry, will use previously allowed leniency to argue for further leniency for their paying clients or themselves.
Using the wording and recalling of the primary law will not be seen as showing Satisfactory diligence!!
When asking for leniency as part of the plea bargain,
As the legally qualified member is vouching for your character
Is based upon their assessment and belief in you as an individual.
Ask?
As a non-represented member of the general public.
Who has no access to the law that the courts
Use to implement and apply the law against/for you.
!
You will not be seen as not!!
Showing satisfactory diligence.
————————————————————-
And it is that hope, if you pay, you may walk free!!
That keeps society breaking the law!!
prl2050
